Friday, March 27, 2009

In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick published an article in the British Science Journal, Nature. They developed a method about how DNA structure was formed which they called the Watson – Crick Model. This model was a double helix structure of DNA to make it easier to explain how DNA worked. This discovery was known as one of the most important scientific discoveries of the century and is still used in high schools and colleges today. In 1968, James Watson published a book called The Double Helix. Anne Sayre published Rosalind Franklin and DNA in 1975. Her book stated how Watson and Crick would not have been able to make the DNA model without Rosalind Franklin’s x-ray diffraction studies. Rosalind Franklin was put in charge of an X-ray diffraction laboratory at Kings College in London. She took an X-ray of DNA which led Watson and Crick to discover the structure of DNA.
Watson and Crick worked together to determine the structure of DNA at Cambridge University. They were able to figure out the correct position and structural pairing of the nucleotide bases based on Rosalind Franklin’s X-rays of DNA. They constructed a model with the knowledge they gained from Franklin’s X-rays and other scientists’ previous experiments. Although they were greatly praised for their work and new discoveries that they had made, they did not credit Franklin for the information that she provided them which made their discoveries possible.

17 comments:

  1. After this contriversy, did Franklin get credit from the scientific community along with Watson and Crick?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with the fact that Franklin should have at least got SOME recognition. But maybe, Franklin wanted to be anonymous? Even if she wished to be anonymous, Watson and Crick should have mentioned they got outside information from another anonymous source, rather than claiming it as their own.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think Franklin should have gotten some credit because they wouldn't have made the structure of DNA without her research.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that if a scientist wants to keep their discoveries to their self they have the right to. I don't see how it can be unethical to want credit for your work and to have the chance to discover more about your ideas yourself before other people can beat you to it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is Sophia. Did Franklin ever get credit...EVER? And also, are the men and Franklin on good terms with one another, or is there some hostility?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Although some people now know that Franklin's work greatly contributed to Watson and Crick's model, I don't think she was ever officially given credit. For the question about hostility toward men, it meant men in general, not only Watson and Crick.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think that Franklin should have definitely gotten credit. Watson and Crick wouldn't have discovered it with out her. Is she currently receiving credit?

    ReplyDelete
  8. To the group: Find more information on Rosalind Franklin and getting credit for her work. Did either Watson or Crick ever acknowledge the work that she did? When did she die? How? When did Watson and Crick receive the Nobel Prize?

    ReplyDelete
  9. If Franklin herself said "I want credit for it" then she should, but if she never came out and said anything about it then it shouln't be a big deal. Although Watson and Crick SHOULD have given her the credit that she deserved, if she didn't say anything then neither should we.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Franklin died on April 6, 1958 from cancer; just a few years before the Nobel Prize was awarded to Watson and Crick in 1962.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think that Franklin should have definitely gotten some credit, but maybe she didn't really care so much. I agree with Raven. I think that maybe she didn't really want for it to be a big deal. I do think they should have attributed her and she should have gotten some credit.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think that Franklin should have been credited in the discovery, but we will never know if she actually wanted to be recognized.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Franklin was not bitter. For a while she did not recognize that Watson and Crick used her work. Once she had, she was even skeptical about details of Watson and Crick's model. She proceeded to work on even more challenging problems like the entire structure of a virus. She was actually friends with Watson and Crick till she died very young of cancer at the age of 37.

    ReplyDelete
  14. If she wanted to be credited I'm sure she would have told someone about their study... If I were her, I would want to be credited for the research because it's a great accomplishment. Something that great doesn't come around too often.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Franklin should have been mentioned when the men accepted the Nobel Prize. I understand that she should have come out and said something, but still... It's like this:
    Say Ms. Laplace gives us a project to study, I don't know, DNA Structure. She gives us some information before we begin our study. The group in charge of the study finds an amazing discovery which leads to great recognition. HOPEFULLY the group would mention that they could not have completed the study without the information given from Ms. Laplace. (Guys, don't think I'm blaming you for anything, I'm just trying to give an example). If they didn't say anything about her, Ms. Laplace would be sad :( and the groups actions would be unethical.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I agree that she should have been given some credit. It was because of her that they made some of the discoveries that they did.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I don't think it was that unethical in this particular instance because Franklin did not really care. After I did further research I found that she was okay with it and was friends with Watson and Crick.

    ReplyDelete